Showing posts with label British placenaming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label British placenaming. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Northern Names – regional aspects of the names of places and people

Regional Heritage Centre

Date: Saturday 03 February 2018 Time: 10.00-16.00

Venue: Management School Lecture Theatre 3 (marked MAN on campus maps, in area G), Lancaster University

 
The academic area of Names Studies encompasses the history and development of first names, surnames and place-names – with lots of potential for interchange between the three! This event will enable us to explore the depth and richness of some of the recent work in this field which casts light on our developing understandings of the cultural significance of names of places and people.

9.30 a.m.              Assemble Management School Lecture Theatre 3 (tea/coffee is not served at beginning of the day – but is available to purchase on campus*) 10.00 – 10.30      History and Names: Introduction to the Day Dr Fiona Edmonds, Director, Regional Heritage Centre, Lancaster University
10.30 – 11.00     Recent work of the Lancashire Place Names Society – Peter Iles, Lancashire Place Names Survey
11.00 – 11.30      Coffee/tea & biscuits

11.30 – 12.30        Exploring language and dialect in North-West England through minor place-names – Dr Eleanor Rye, Institute for Name-Studies, University of Nottingham
12.30 – 1.30        Lunch*

1.30 – 2.30          Field-Names in the Lake District – Angus Winchester, Emeritus Professor of Local and Landscape History, Lancaster University
2.30 – 3.00           Tea/coffee & biscuits

3.00 – 4.00          Every Tom, Dick and Harry: the significance of personal names – Dr George Redmonds, author of titles including Names and History (Hambledon, 2007) and A Dictionary of Yorkshire Surnames (Paul Watkins, 2015)
4.00 p.m.      Close of Study Day
 
Fee for this event: £26 (£23.40 for Friends and Patrons of the Centre) (fee includes coffee/tea & biscuits)
Lunch: *Sandwiches/coffee/tea can be bought on the University campus (either at SPAR supermarket, Juicafe, Gregg's or Costa Coffee).  Hot and cold snacks and drinks are also available at Café Republic - or you are welcome to bring your own lunch.
Parking: On Saturdays free parking is available on campus.
How to Book: please book for this event through the University's Online Store here.

Printer friendly details of this event will be available shortly.

Contact: rhc@lancaster.ac.uk

Who can attend: Anyone
Our events are extremely popular and many book up within the first few weeks. We strongly recommend that you book early to avoid disappointment. If you do have to cancel your booking please give us five full working days’ notice and we will happily arrange a refund. Please note that refunds can now only be made via electronic means.  Should you require a refund we will need a note of your account name, account number and sort-code.  Payments originally made by credit card can be reimbursed via the same card details.


The Main entrance to the Management School (LUMS) has been blocked by construction works. Please look out for large signs (with arrows) directing you to the temporary side entrance around the corner, down Grizedale Avenue.
You will now enter the Management School via the Hub Café and proceed up the ramp towards Lecture Theatre 3 (signposted).
We apologise for any inconvenience. Parking on the university campus remains free of charge on Saturdays, but please allow extra time to make your way to the venue - we will start promptly with the first presentation commencing at 10:00 am.
Campus Maps are available online at: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/contact-and-getting-here/maps-and-travel/maps/

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

The thing about -ing(tūn)


http://onomastics.co.uk/the-thing-about-ingtun/

Posted on December 1, 2014 by 


Robert Briggs, MA Viking & Anglo-Saxon Studies graduand, University of Nottingham
 
I recently completed an MA in Viking and Anglo-Saxon Studies at the University of Nottingham, capping off the course with a dissertation re-examining the philological evidence for place-names in the county of Surrey in South-East England which have been, or else could be, suggested to derive from Old English (OE) -ingas and -ingahām. These two place-name endings have been at the heart of many of the scholarly debates that catalysed the advances in English place-name studies during the twentieth century, and still excite the interest of linguists and other scholars for what they might be able to reveal about Early Anglo-Saxon society. One of my primary motivations for choosing them as the subject of my dissertation was the feeling that existing datasets must be revisited and reassessed in the light of the latest scholarship before they can be cited as evidence of specific naming trends or wider social processes. As is so often the case with undertaking extended pieces of research, I looked at several interesting strands of evidence that, for reasons of space, didn’t make the final cut. I have used my own blog as an outlet for one such topic and I am truly grateful for the opportunity to outline my thoughts on another here!
My subject matter here is OE -ingtūn, another place-name ending that again has been the subject of much debate and several quite different interpretations. There are numerous place-names which have been identified as reaching back to OE -ingtūn in England, so it is no surprise that it was used as the archetype for Warmington on Sea, the fictional Sussex seaside town that was the setting for the British TV comedy classic Dad’s Army. (Nor should we forget the real-life inspiration behind the name of Paddington Bear.) Indeed, perceptions of its ubiquity have led to “ington” being reported in contemporary colloquial speech in the Urban Dictionary.
Strictly speaking, -ingtūn didn’t exist as a lexical item, since the -ing particle relates to the preceding noun in the compound (of which more presently), not to the oh-so-common generic tūn. Translations of this element are many and varied, so, rather than take up the rest of this blog post going through them, for our purposes those of “farm, village, estate” can be read into the examples cited below even though I refrain from translating the term. Because place-names featuring the combination of -ing followed by tūn are so common, it has been pragmatically treated as an element in its own right by some leading authorities, notably A. H. Smith in his benchmark 1956 work English Place-Name Elements.
What did -ing signify? Much like tūn, it most likely possessed multiple meanings. Greater emphasis has been placed on some over others by different scholars. The prevailing current opinion, or at least that taken throughout English Place-Name Society publications, is that -ing is a singular suffix which, when paired with tūn, had an associative function, i.e. “called after [personal name]”. An alternative way of interpreting a large number of -ingtūn place-names as formations starting with topographical appellatives – “called or at [noun]” – came to the fore in the 1970s thanks to papers by Gillian Fellows Jensen and Olaf Arngart. The reading advocated by the great Swedish linguist Eilert Ekwall, that -ing was a reduced inflected form of the OE genitive plural -inga, indicating a group of people (or things), has fallen out of favour owing to the repeated criticisms published by other linguists over the decades.
Turning to Surrey, nine of the county’s place-names are listed as being from -ingtūn in the English Place-Name Society volume The Place-Names of Surrey (PNS): Addington, Artington, Beddington, Chivington, Cuddington, Enton, Kennington, Pointers, Stevens Bridge. Appearance in this list did not equal absolute acceptance of their derivation on the part of the book’s authors, since they put a question mark against Enton. Revisiting the evidence in 2014, 80 years since PNS was published, has given me reasons to believe several of the place-names can be interpreted in different and more credible ways.
There are some misleading false friends to separate out first. For starters, the conjecture in PNS that Chilberton in Merstham (earliest Chelberton1298) suffered the loss of a medial -ing, and hence was originally OE Cēolbeorhtingtūn, has no precedent in the county’s toponymy. Surrey place-names did not lose medial -ing, but not infrequently they did gain it in Middle English (ME), and sometimes retained it through to the present day. Luddington in Egham parish (Sodyn(g)ton 1332-33) is earliest Sudinton 1213, and so is perhaps to be interpreted as the elliptical OE sūth in tūne“place south of the tūn”. In the case of Wallington (Wallyngton 1377), its many renderings as Waletona-e from 1076 x 84 strongly suggest it derives from OE w(e)alh-tūn. “slaves’/Britons’ tūn”. More extreme in its corruption is Artington, Erdinton(a) 1172 and Erdyngton 1279, but also Ertendon(e) 1191-1318, Eardendon’ 1234. The range of spellings is such that Artington may not be an -ingtūn at all, rather OE *Eardan-dūn, a combination of the genitive singular of the hypocoristic (shortened) personal name *Earda and dūn, “hill”.
The suggested presence of the genitive singular inflection of a weak masculine personal name in Artington may be repeated in two supposed Surrey -ingtūnas, bearing out the contentions made by Smith as early as 1936 regarding the intrusion of -ing particles in many place-names during or by the ME period. Chivington in Bletchingley is Civentone 1086 and Chivington’ 1235, making an etymology of *Cifan-tūn, “*Cifa’s tūn” as likely if not more so. Enton in Witley does not occur on record until the fourteenth century. It has been postulated as an -ingtūn on the strength of forms likeEnyngton 1377-86, but earlier spellings, e.g. Eneton’ 1332 are commensurate with formations which include tūn but not -ing: the specific could be the either of the personal names Ēana or Eni, or the nouns ened, “duck”, or *ean, “lamb”. Arguments for parallel traditions of forms with and without a medial -ing particle put forward by linguists such John Dodgson cannot be dismissed altogether, but Smith’s concept of “secondary” -ing particles fits a number of Surrey place-names very well.
In her recent PhD thesis, Jill Bourne set out the idea that Kennington in Lambeth (Chenintune 1086, Kenigton 1274-1316) may not be an -ingtūn formation incorporating the personal name Cena, rather one combining cyng, “king” with tūn. If representing a version of the recurrent “Kingston” place-name, this may account for the similarity of many of its ME spellings with those of the Middlesex place-names Kempton and Kenton. Another postulated Surrey -ingtūn with apparent namesakes outside the county is Stevens Bridge in Chertsey (Styvynton 1189 x 99). The close resemblance of its ME spellings to the places named Steventon in Berkshire and Hampshire allows the extension of conjectures around their etymologies, with the shift from the specific being the personal name *Stīf(a) + -ing + tūn to one introducing a topographical *styficing, “place where trees have been grubbed up”, + tūn. In a similar vein, Fellows Jensen’s reassessment of Pointers in Cobham (Pontintone in a number of spurious Anglo-Saxon charters from a cartulary of 13th century date, otherwise Puntinton 1219-21) as a name deriving not from the late-recorded personal name Punt but an appellative *punting, “flat-bottom boat place”. This would make topographical sense as Pointers lies across the River Mole from the rest of Cobham parish and a small ferry crossing would have been an apt alternative to a bridge.
This leaves Addington, Beddington, and Cuddington. Although only Beddington has credible OE spellings (e.g. Beaddinctun 900 x 908,Beaddingtun 996 x 1010), each offers abundant evidence for the medial element being an original OE singular -ing, with Addington’s rendering asAdingetone 1203 the only ME spelling which could be interpreted as being derived from plural -inga. They are also united by having first elements that can only be credibly interpreted as masculine personal names: ÆddiBēadaCuda. The first of these names has been suggested to reappear in Addiscombe (Ad(d)escomp(e) 1279-) very close to Addington, inflected in the genitive singular with no hint of an -ing particle.
Not only are these three place-names linguistically analogous, they also form a distinct grouping which clusters around Croydon, an important place in the core zone of early medieval Surrey, now on the southern outskirts of London. It seems justifiable to consider whether the trio might share much the same means and date of origin. This is the direction my research is going in next and, at this early stage, I can offer a couple of observations.
The earliest credible examples of -ingtūn formations are to be located in Mercia or its annexed territories in the English West Midlands in the second half of the eighth century; they do not occur in South-East England until several decades later. More generally, connective -ing particles are not in evidence in the charter boundary descriptions of estates in Kent (the county due east of Surrey) before the later 780s, right at the time historical sources record Mercia secured control over the previously-independent Kentish kingdom. Its overlordship of Surrey may have been of longer duration (apparently prompting the construction of a number of defensive ditches on or close to the present Surrey-Kent border). One way of reading this evidence is to link the spread of place-names with -ing as a medial element, particularly in combination with personal names, to the extension of Mercian military-political power and attendant patronage in the eighth and early-ninth century.
Putting Addington, Beddington, Cuddington and other early-attested correlates within a historical context for which a reasonable number of documentary sources are extant invites testing of the possibility that we might be able to hazard guesses as to the identities of men like Æddi,Bēada and Cuda. Here speaks the optimist in me! I grant you, raking over old place-name spellings may not be the most glamourous or exciting work to carry out and report in the world of onomastics. Nevertheless, I strongly believe the reassessment of discrete populations of names supposedly of the same derivation or, as in the case of -ingtūn, having one or more element in common, is a necessary first step to identifying new groupings (or confirming the validity of old ones). With an improved understanding of the probable meanings of place-names comes a firmer foundation on which to build, through reaching out to consider other forms of evidence, better interpretations of the dates and circumstances of their coinage.
A little -ingtūn reading list…
Arngart, O., ‘On the ingtūn Type of English Place-Name’, Studia Neophilologica, 44 (1972), 263-73.
Bourne, J., The Place-Name Kingston and its Context, Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ([October] 2011) [Kennington is in unpaginated Material section as code SUR[REY] 3].
Dodgson, J. McN., ‘Various forms of Old English -ing in English place-names’, Beiträge zur Namenforschung, Neue Folge, 2 (1967), 325-96.
Ekwall, E., The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Place-Names, 4th edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960) [especially pages xi and 264].
Fellows Jensen, Gillian, ‘English Place-Names such as Doddington and Donnington’, Sydsvenska Ortnamnssällskapets Årsskrift (1974), 26-65.
Gover, J. E. B., A. Mawer and F. M. Stenton, The Place-Names in Surrey, English Place-Name Society, 11 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934) [especially pages 346 and 352].
Smith, A. H., ‘Analogical development of -ing- and the interpretation of Patrington’, Leeds Studies in English, 5 (1936), 71-73 [https://ludos.leeds.ac.uk:443/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=134422&silo_library=GEN01]
Smith, A. H., English Place-Name Elements, Part 1 (Á-Īw), English Place-Name Society, 25 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956) [especially pages 291-97].
Watts, V., The Cambridge Dictionary of English Place-Names (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) [especially pages xlv-xlvi].

Monday, July 21, 2014

Are these the most unusual Nottingham names ever?

University archivists unearth strange monikers from history

By Nottingham Post  |  Posted: July 16, 2014
A drawing of Nottingham's Market Square where markets and fair were held, in the 1800s
A drawing of Nottingham's Market Square where markets and fair were held, in the 1800s
 
Archivists at the University of Nottingham have unearthed a unique collection of strange names from their document collection.
blog post on the University's Manuscript and Special Collections website listed the names.
All the entries are from archives at the University and are taken from family and estate papers, business records and religious collections.
Kathryn Steenson, Assistant Archivist at the University said: "Some [of the names] were found by staff cataloguing the documents and others from the name-indexing our team of volunteers is working on."
Original Steele, of Clarborough, Nottingham, was presented before the Archdeaconry Court in 1612 for sexual immorality with the wife of William Tomlinson. His job was a ‘sometime’ churchwarden
Barefoot Booth was also a churchwarden in North Wheatley in the 1670s
Restored Bendall, a framework knitter of Nottingham St Mary, was brought before the Archdeaconry court in 1680 for not receiving Holy Communion
Dymock Wallpoole and Marmaduke Witham were among the parties mentioned in a deed poll dated 1704/5
- A baby girl was baptised with the name Mercy Puffin in 1718
- Mr and Mrs Crisp ensured a family surname was carried on when they baptised their son Madewell Crisp on 27th July 1726
Treverse Spilie, whose gender was not clear from records, was baptised in March 1728
Saintly Whitehead, a blacksmith of Trowell, Nottinghamshire, appears in the Archdeaconry Court records in 1774, but lived up to his honest name by acting as a bondsman to guarantee the good conduct of another
Hearsay Wood, aged 22, married Jane Foottitt in 1782 in Newark
Daft Smith, appears several times organising the financial affairs of the late businessman Samuel Morley in the 1790s.
Thoroton Pocklington appears in a series of vouchers and receipts in 1809-1810
Stockdale Avison was a member of Castle Gate Congregational Church in the 1830s
Kitty Bounds appears in a list of founder members of Broad Street General Baptist Church, Nottingham in 1817
- In the same year, Webster Whistler was engaged in correspondence with Lord William Bentinck


more: http://www.nottinghampost.com/unusual-Nottingham-names-University-archivists/story-21645093-detail/story.html#ixzz386gLl6Cq

Friday, November 1, 2013

Manuscript layout as evidence for word prototypicality in Old English, with particular reference to onomastic items / Leonie Mhari Dunlop.

Manuscript layout as evidence for word prototypicality in Old English, with particular reference to onomastic items / Leonie Mhari Dunlop.

This master thesis investigates the contribution of manuscript spacing to our understanding of Old English palaeography, the development of the language, and the categorization of lexical items. This study focusses on onomastic items and their treatment in a section of the Old English annals of the Parker Chronicle and Peterborough Chronicle. While many studies focus on the reader’s relationship to the text, this research focusses on the scribe’s relationship to the text. Influenced by Saenger’s Space between Words (1997), this thesis uses a new methodology to measure the spacing between lexical items and collect data. The results challenge the categorization of lexical items in Old English as they are currently defined and illustrate the potential of this approach in further research. They also reaffirm the importance of observing the manuscripts themselves.

http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3180/
http://books.google.de/books/about/Manuscript_Layout_as_Evidence_for_Word_P.html?id=WEySMwEACAAJ&redir_esc=y 

written and defended by Dunlop, Leonie Mhari



http://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/critical/postgrad/currentpostgraduatestudents/leoniemdunlop/

Leonie is the PhD student on the AHRC–funded Scottish Toponymy in Transition project (www.gla.ac.uk/stit/) which is running for three years at Glasgow University. She started her PhD in October 2011. From her doctoral studies she has developed interests in historical geography, medieval economics and the emergence of Scots language.

Leonie is investigating the place-names of Berwickshire. Within Berwickshire there are 32 historical parishes. Her research focuses on four parishes: Abbey St Bathans, Bunkle & Preston, Cockburnspath and Coldingham. A large number of medieval charters dating from 11th-13th century survive in Durham for Coldingham. Areas of investigation will include Anglo-Scottish relations, the treatment of place-names in medieval documents, and a diachronic survey of the place-names. This survey will include information collected from local residents about field-names and other unpublished names. Names in use today will be transcribed to show the local pronunciation. Using the Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary the relationship between the lexicon and the onomasticon will be mapped. 

Along with Alice Crook (PhD student in the school of Critical Studies) Leonie runs the Onomastics Reading Group and ‘onomastics.co.uk’ (built and maintained by Scott McGready). Together they are organizing the pre-conference workshop for the Society for Name Studies in Britain and Ireland in April 2013.