Showing posts with label SNSBI Spring conference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SNSBI Spring conference. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 31, 2020

SNSBI 29th Spring Conference 17-20 April 2020

SNSBI

The conference has been postponed to 16-19 October 2020; further information and updated program to follow.

The 2020 SNSBI Spring conference will be held at the Heronston Hotel, Bridgend, Glamorgan.
Heronston is one of the interesting post-Conquest -ton places-names of south Wales. According to B. G. Charles, Non-Celtic place-names of Wales (1938), p.134, it means ‘Henry's farm’, and was recorded as Henrieston in c.1336.
The hotel is a 20-minute walk from Bridgend station, which is a mainline station with hourly connections. Bus 303 towards Barry runs hourly from the station to the hotel. The cost of the conference for SNSBI members, which includes en-suite accommodation, the coach excursion, use of leisure facilities, and all meals (excluding wine) is £370. The day delegate rate for members attending the full conference is £190. The coach trip on Sunday afternoon will be to the St Fagans National Museum of History. This world-renowned open-air museum showcases historic buildings relocated from across Wales, including a farm, a tannery, mills, and a chapel.
The conference will open on Friday night with a lecture from Prys Morgan, Emeritus Professor in History at Swansea University. Professor Morgan is co-author of Welsh Surnames, and is a specialist in Welsh history.
To reserve a place please pay a £50 deposit per person (non-refundable), together with the completed booking form (or an e-mail containing the same details), to treasurer at snsbi.org.uk. Direct bank transfers are the preferred method as they incur minimal cost to the society. Account name: Society for Name Studies in Britain and Ireland, sort code: 20-09-72, account: 50676683. Cheques should be made payable to ‘Society for Name Studies in Britain and Ireland’. Those wishing to pay by PayPal please follow the link below. Bursaries toward the cost of accommodation are available to student members. Please contact the treasurer for further details.
We must receive your booking and deposit by the 30th November 2019 to reserve your accommodation. Full cost of the conference is payable by end of January 2020. Only paid-up delegates can be guaranteed a place. The conference cost is non-refundable unless another delegate can be found to take the room.
The booking form is here, and the PayPal link is immediately below.

Confirmed papers

Keith Briggs, ‘The history of the word “beach”’

As we sit here only a few kilometres from Ogmore Beach and Merthyr Mawr Beach, it is pertinent to remember that the word “beach” belongs to that very small class of words first appearing in modern English (in this case, about 1535), which have no obvious (or even unobvious) antecedents in English, and which lack cognates in any other language. Recently I proposed a refinement of a suggestion of Ekwall that “beach” arose by semantic shift from a word of quite different meaning; in the new version of this theory “beach” is a lexicalization of a single specific place-name in Eastbourne in Sussex. If correct, this theory would make the word even more unusual; it would be a word arising from a toponym; a process not normally considered by etymologists. Reference: Keith Briggs, The Etymology of ‘Beach’, Notes and Queries, Volume 66 (2019), 370–374. online paper.

Rob Briggs, ‘Benson and hedging my bets’

Benson (formerly Bensington) in Oxfordshire is a place that makes several appearances in Old English-period written records, most arising from its status as an important centre of secular power in a frontier zone between the kingdoms of Mercia and Wessex. The collected early spellings of its name are rather more diverse than might be expected, and for this reason the etymological analyses found in most scholarly reference works on English place-names are not reflective of the full corpus of attestations. This paper will take a fresh look at the early name-forms off the back of introducing another into the equation, one that occurs in a text of late seventh-century origin. The discussion of this evidence will highlight the importance of paying attention to the textual transmission of sources and the latest historical scholarship for political context alongside the more standard concerns of place-name studies. This “new” evidence may be suggestive, but is not conclusive. Nevertheless, the written record reveals Benson to have been not only a place of repeated political significance, but also a place-name with a more complex etymological history than previously recognised.

Thomas Clancy (University of Glasgow), ‘St Cadog in Scotland’

In his Latin Lives, the south Welsh saint Cadog of Llancarfan makes a journey to Scotland, founding a monastery and creating miracles. Did Cadog have a genuine cult in medieval Scotland? This paper explores the problems with this, arguing that the information in the Lives has come from Scotland, and that this is an instance of 'magpie hagiography’, Cadog having been confused with a saint of another name. But which saint? The paper will take in some problems of saints’ names and place-names, in both Scotland and south Wales.

Conchubhar Ó Crualaoich (The Placenames Branch), ‘Irish surnames in Irish townland names: a potential diagnostic for hereditary professional status

Irish townland names such as Baile Uí Mhaoldoraidh “the town(land) of Ó Maoldoraidh” seems, at an early state of research, to consist of less than 10% of all townland names from Irish. Where there was Anglo-Norman settlement and subsequent re-gaelicisation the percentage of Anglo-Norman surnames in Irish language place-names seems much higher (further research is need here). Certainly, in some counties where colonisation was extensive such as Wexford, there are more Anglo-Norman surnames in the place-names of Irish language origin that there are native surnames, even in areas recovered and dominated by the native Gaelic Irish themselves. Both sets of names seem to have been created under different legal conditions. Tenure was generally more secure under English freehold –less so under the Irish system, so the name of the occupying family could not be used on a frequent basis. Most Irish surnames found in the Sligo place-names, both extant and defunct, seem to have belonged to families with professional branches, learned or military. In contrast, the surnames of the principal septs are only rarely found in the townland names in Sligo. This must to be connected with the fact that professional families received land under different terms than the general population, and even members of the principal septs. Their tenure seems to have been more permanent and therefore conducive to lending their surname to their land. Should this pattern be repeated in other counties (and a quick perusal of townland names in some other counties seem to reflect this), it would suggests that one can use the occurrence of a surname (outside of the principal septs) in a townland name is an indicator of a probable professional background—this has particularly useful implications for our understand of native Irish culture and life prior to its demise from 1600 onwards. The use of place-names containing an Irish surname to diagnose the possible professional background of that family has not been suggested heretofore.

Keziah Garrett-Smithson (Aberystwyth University), ‘Ieuan, Johannis and John: 100 years of Welsh names’

Our first names provide the foundation of our identity. They place us within our family, wider community and culture. Although we cannot directly ask people who lived in early modern Wales what influenced their choices, we can gain insight from the names themselves. This paper focuses upon the first names of the people of Cardiganshire, in west Wales, over the period 1542-1659 as they appear in the court of Great Sessions records. The Great Sessions was the highest court within Wales from its foundation under the second act of union until its abolition in 1830. Although patchy in places, these files contain a cross-section of society and reveal patterns in the way in which names were chosen. For instance, we can trace the popularity and decline of specific names. In addition to this, Cardiganshire’s topography makes it an excellent place to use as a case study. The mountainous terrain made travel arduous and although maritime trade flourished during the 16th and 17th centuries, inland communication was much slower. With this in mind, we can investigate to what extent wider influences, for example from England or neighbouring counties, impacted name choices in relation to local traditions.

Clare Green (SOAS, University of London), ‘Naming Welsh-speaking children: case studies from London and Gwynedd’

Many factors go into choosing children's names, and for multilingual families there are extra issues to consider. Should the name represent all the family’s languages? How much should it take into account the linguistic environment the family lives in? Does the chosen name predict the language(s) a child will speak as they grow up? This paper looks at two families with a first-language Welsh-speaking parent, living in very different linguistic landscapes: one in London and one in Gwynedd, North Wales. Based on qualitative interviews with parents, it explores how they chose their children's names, the influence of their Welsh-speaking heritage, and how the decisions reflect their slinguistic attitudes and practices. This research uses names as a medium to learn about personal experiences of multilingualism and family language policy. This paper is based on research for a Masters dissertation in Language Documentation and Description.

Caroline Høglund Valentin Boolsen and Johnny Grandjean Gøgsig Jakobsen (University of Copenhagen), ‘Variations in Scandinavian place-names home and abroad: a comparative analysis of specifics for names in by, thorp, thweit and holm between Yorkshire, England, and Sjælland, Denmark’

Although it is well known by scholarship in both England and Denmark that a significant number of place-names in northern, central and eastern England appear to be of Scandinavian origin, relatively little has been done on either side to actually compare the toponomastic evidence found in England with that of its potential Scandinavian homeland. From a Danish perspective, an inclusion of Scandinavian (and probably predominantly Danish) settlement names in the Danelaw region would virtually double the amount of data evidence in medieval Danish toponymy. From an English perspective, a better understanding of how the Scandinavian place-names in England correspond to their namesakes in the Scandinavian homeland would improve the basis for seeing them in their right linguistic and settlement-historical context in England. This paper will take off in a new planned project to ease such comparative studies in the future by launching an online database of Scandinavian Settlement Names in Danelaw England. The paper will perform a comparative analysis of variations in the types of specifics that can be found for four groups of medieval place-names present in both Yorkshire, England, and Sjælland, Denmark: settlement names in ‑by, ‑thorp, ‑thweit and ‑holm.

Carole Hough (University of Glasgow), ‘“The most English county in Scotland”: Berwickshire place-names revisited’

Famously described by James B. Johnston as “the most English county in Scotland” (1940:7), the historical county of Berwickshire was the study area for the REELS project, funded by The Leverhulme Trust from 2016-2019. Eighty years after Johnston’s pioneering publication, it is appropriate to revisit the issues in light of more recent work. An overview of languages represented in the REELS database shows a preponderance of place-names from Old English (OE) and its descendants Scots and Scottish Standard English, the northern siblings of Middle English and Modern English. Individual formations represent doublets of common compounds recognised as name-types in England, for which the Scottish evidence adds to the overall picture (OE burh-tūn, OE hōh-tūn, OE mere-tūn), as well as doublets of rarer compounds where the English and Scottish occurrences throw light on each other (OE hrīs-tūn). While there are particularly close parallels with neighboring Northumberland (OE hwīt-ceaster), others occur as far afield as Wales (OE snāw-dūn). All occurrences of OE terms in Berwickshire extend their distribution further north. Of particular interest are rare terms (OE bæc-stān, OE bēmere, OE grǣg), terms unrepresented in English place-names (OE cyrn), and terms with a meaning previously hypothesised but unproven (OE cild). Reference: James B. Johnston, The Place-Names of Berwickshire (Edinburgh, 1940).

Peter Kitson, ‘When did “Old European” river-names begin?’

It is generally (albeit not universally) agreed that the class of river-names called alteuropäisch are Indo-European linguistically, but there is not general agreement how early within Indo-European they began. Hans Krahe, who first identified the type, characterized it as north-west Indo-European, by a rather impressionistic relation of its phonetics to the geography of surviving branches; W. P. Schmid, analysing the morphology, put back its origins to Common Indo-European. Linguists have tended to choose between these labels according to their opinions on the perennially vexed question of where the “original homeland” of Indo-European speakers was: Krahe’s fits nicely the currently much favoured steppe theory, Schmid’s doesn’t. One obvious test to make is to compare alteuropäisch to the oldest Indian river-names to see whether they seem to go back to a common system. I ducked this in the 1990s, thinking scholarship on the Indian names was not such as a non-Sanskritist could use with acceptable control of margins of error. Work by Michael Witzel and especially Václav Blažek has remedied that situation. This paper will compare alteuropäisch river-names with the more than two dozen attested in the Rigveda. Alteuropäisch names are suffixal monothematic in structure, their phonology implies grammatically adjectives not nouns; a substantial majority are of feminine gender. Vedic river-names are overwhelmingly adjectival semantically, mostly suffixal monothematic, and almost without exception feminine. I conclude that though the visibly productive name-elements are different, alteuropäisch and Vedic river-names are indeed probably exponents of a single original system of naming landscape features. Whether or not that system goes back all the way to the Ursprache probably cannot be directly demonstrated because the Anatolian material is problematic; either way it is something decisively wider than “north-west Indo-European”. 

Jonathan Masters (Lancaster University), ‘The changing marshlands along the River Alt, Lancashire: evidence of minor place-names, c. 1220–1300’

The wetlands either side of the River Alt in south west Lancashire has historically drawn considerable investment from agriculturalists despite this challenging environment. Today, the landscape supports a significant agricultural and horticultural economy, achieved through extensive drainage works initiated from the late eighteenth century. However, the evidence found in local muniment collections dating from the thirteenth century suggest a considerable effort for managing and improving the wetlands was made much earlier, especially following the introduction of two competing Cistercian houses. In the absence of manorial and administrative accounts - that would record the detail of such activities and its economic yield - we must look to the evidence of place-names to demonstrate any vast improvement in land under cultivation or expansion into new locations. Significantly, the boundary clauses in title deeds often recorded minor place-names attributed to significant features used to define the limits of possession. This paper draw on the evidence of place-names and their interpretation to uncover the earliest description of these environments and explain how medieval agriculturalists set about changing and drawing value from this marshland landscape in south west Lancashire.

Harry Parkin (University of Chester), ‘Surnames ending -sons: their history and distribution, and some methodological difficulties’

Surnames ending -sons, such as Johnsons and Jacksons, have received very little attention in the field of anthroponomastics. It is an unusual form that challenges expectations of by-name and surname formation, which is presumably what has led what little previous research there is to suggest it is ‘anomalous’ (McKinley 1977: 231); it appears only McKinley (1977: 231; 1990: 121) and Rodgers (1995: 223) have mentioned this ending before. This paper presents research that is a work in progress. It will look at the history, development and distribution of names ending -sons, in an effort to gain a greater understanding of this particular form. Some examples will be discussed, and possible explanations for their origins, based on known regional surnaming patterns, will be offered, while making it clear that there are considerable methodological challenges still to be overcome. Preliminary findings are far from conclusive, but there are some patterns beginning to emerge, and it is hoped that this report will stimulate further discussion and ideas around this rare surname form. References: R. A. McKinley, The Surnames of Oxfordshire (London, 1977); R. A. McKinley, A History of British Surnames (London: 1990); C. D. Rogers, The Surname Detective (Manchester, 1995).

Jo Pye, ‘By Tre, Pol and Pen: mapping Cornish place-names in the landscape’

This paper will cover selected aspects of research undertaken for my PhD thesis in Landscape Archaeology at the University of Exeter, investigating Cornish Place-Names in the Landscape. The thesis builds on prior research into Cornish place-names by Dr Oliver Padel together with Historic Environment Record data shared by the Cornwall County Archaeological Unit. The approach uses Geographic Information System mapping to show patterns evident in selected Cornish place-name elements for medieval settlements throughout Cornwall. Over 5100 place-name elements were mapped according to their positions in the landscape in relation to natural features and settlement distributions, elevation, historical background, geology and soils contexts, and characterisation of historic landscape types. The research also covers dates of first attestation of settlement names, Domesday status where relevant, subsequent changes in name forms, and frequency of combinations with other place-name elements. The conference presentation will highlight research questions, headline findings from the research and how they have been underpinned by seventeen case studies of place-name element types. Topographical and habitative name elements were included in the sample studied, and confirm that they were originally assigned according to distinctive criteria reflecting shifting histories of settlement and language across Cornwall.

Goabilwe Nnanishie Ramaeba (University of Botswana), ‘A semantic analysis of lexically transparent personal names in Scotland’

The presence or absence of lexical meaning in personal names has been a contentious issue for many years across societies. The general consensus from previous studies (deKlerk & Lagonikos 1995, Hanks et al 2006) has been that names in the African context have a lexically transparent meaning while those in the European context have a lexically non-transparent meaning. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the fact that although this might be generally true, there are exceptions which need to be appreciated and acknowledged. This paper presents a semantic analysis of lexically transparent names found in Scotland and the motivations behind the names. The data for this study was collected in Glasgow for a PhD study and it indicates that a total of 353 name tokens were collected and 330 (93.5%) of these were lexically transparent while 23 (6.5%) were lexically nontransparent. The latter may be regarded as inconsequential because it is so small but it is significant as it forms part of the Scotland name-scape. The 23 name tokens are categorized into 9 semantic categories which include, Animals and birds, Months of the Year, Plants and Flowers amongst others. The sociolinguistic aspects of the names are also explored to establish the motivations behind the giving of the names and to see if these are linked to the transparent nature of the names.

Jennifer Scherr, ‘Place-names in Somerset’s royal forests’

Large areas of Somerset were once designated royal forests. Major names, particularly in Exmoor, Mendip, Neroche and Selwood, will be surveyed for their relevance. In addition, names in medieval forest perambulations, will be studied.

Catherine Swift (Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick), ‘Names, surnames and epithets in the Dublin Guild Merchant Roll pre AD 1223’

DNA studies, between 2005 and 2015 in particular, have had a strong interest in surnames and surname lineages which, in turn, has helped increase scholarly interest in the topic. The Dublin Guild Merchant Roll represents an apparently ethnically diverse group of people, most of whom appear to be recent arrivals, into a much older Hiberno-Norse city with a strong tradition in maritime trade. The nearest comparator is apparently the guild roll of Leicester which was being compiled in roughly the same period and which also represents a guild in a town with strong Scandinavian roots. Comparisons and contrasts between the two rolls are therefore of interest as is the extent to which the habits visible in the Dublin merchant roll can be detected in Irish language sources during the period of the Anglo-Norman colony.

Thursday, October 17, 2019

Call for papers by SNSBI for the Annual Spring Conference 2020

SNSBI 29th Annual Spring Conference



17-20 April, 2020

Best Western Heronston Hotel, Bridgend 

Proposals are invited for twenty-minute papers and short project reports on any aspect of name-studies in Britain and Ireland. 


Abstracts of no more than 200 words should be sent by 
31 October 2019. 

Informal enquiries are also welcomed. 

Proposals for papers should be sent to: 
Dr Rebecca Gregory 
School of English 
University of Nottingham NG7 2RD 
rebecca.gregory@ nottingham.ac.uk

Friday, April 19, 2019

SNSBI Twenty-eighth Spring Conference 2019

Link

This meeting will be held at the University of Nottingham. The program and abstracts are below.

Friday 26 April

  • 1930: John Beckett, Laxton (Nottinghamshire): England's last open field village

Saturday 27 April

  • 0900 David Parsons, Rolly, Judith and The Snogs: some place-name puzzles from Oswestry
  • 0945 Justin Ó Gliasáin, Microtoponyms in the baronies of Offaly East and Offaly West, County Kildare
  • 1015 Postgraduate workshop report
  • 1100 Jennifer Scherr, Ford names in Somerset
  • 1130 Ann Cole, John Blair's clusters and the directional tūns
  • 1200 Richard Coates, Naming Shirehampton and the name Shirehampton
  • 1330 Fred Puss, Estonian peasant surnames of English origin
  • 1400 Peter McClure, The English surname detective: recent encounters with phantoms, doppelgängers, shape changers, impostors and victims of mistaken identity
  • 1515 Eila Williamson, Place-names on the Scottish border
  • 1545 Mícheál Ó Mainnín and Frances Kane, Scottish influence on the place-names of Co. Antrim
  • 1615 Chloé Colla, Field-name evidence in a Lake District parish
  • 1700 Liora Bigon, Enhancing place names studies acumen: historiographic reflections between (urban) Africa and Israel/Palestine
  • 1730 Rob Briggs, A new lease of life (or three) for understanding the Old English -ing4 connective particle?
  • 1800 Willian Patterson, The place-name Romanno in Peeblesshire
  • 1945 Cameron Lecture: Lesley Abrams, Vive la Différence? Place-names and Scandinavian settlement in England and Normandy in the Viking Age

Sunday 28 April

  • 0900 SNSBI AGM
  • 0945 Keith Briggs, The surnames of thirteenth-century Ipswich
  • 1015 Jeremy Piercy, Mint genealogies: moneying families in late Anglo-Saxon England
  • 1100 Mairéad Nic Lochlainn, Project report on Logainm.ie and Meitheal Logainm.ie
  • 1130 Pádraig Ó Cearbhaill, Irish place-names associated with death
  • 1300 Excursion
  • 1830 Conference dinner
  • 1945 Thomas Clancy, The names of the parishes of the Galloway Glens
  • 2030 Jeremy Harte, You'll never walk alone: haunted roads and goblin names
  • 2100 Paul Cavill, A New Dictionary of English Field-Names
  • 2115 Book launch: A New Dictionary of English Field-Names, by Paul Cavill, with a wine reception sponsored by the English Place-Name Society

Abstracts

John Beckett (University of Nottingham) Opening lecture: ‘Laxton (Nottinghamshire): England’s last open field village’

Laxton is unique. It is the only village in England which still has a working manor court, protected by legislation (1977). It has never been fully enclosed, and so it offers us an opportunity to studying the pre-enclosure landscape, fields, furlongs, strips and names galore. John Beckett has been researching and advising on the history of the village for thirty years. He is President of the Laxton History Group, and a trustee of the village’s Visitors’ Centre. In this talk he will be telling us something about the village and its history, and also about the current position, where the owner, the Crown Estate Commission, is trying to sell the property but to ensure that the historical traditions at Laxton are maintained.

David Parsons (Centre for Advanced Welsh & Celtic Studies, University of Wales) ‘Rolly, Judith and The Snogs: some place-name puzzles from Oswestry’

In an undemanding early morning paper, I shall discuss some puzzling place-names from a bilingual border area. In some cases I have solutions or suggestions to offer; in others I am simply looking for help.

Justin Ó Gliasáin (Fiontar & Scoil na Gaeilge, DCU) ‘Microtoponyms in the baronies of Offaly East and Offaly West, County Kildare’

This presentation will give an overview of my PhD research which focuses on microtoponyms in the Baronies of Offaly East and Offaly West in County Kildare. Details will be given of the overall aims of the project as well as on the sources used to gather microtoponym data. Examples of some of the microtoponyms collected to date will also be given.

Jennifer Scherr ‘Ford names in Somerset’

Abstract to follow

Ann Cole ‘John Blair’s clusters and the directional tūns’

In Building Anglo-Saxon England, John Blair noted that places bearing certain -tūn names tend to cluster together, among them the Burtons and Charltons plus some functional tūns such as Stratton and Drayton. It was too big a topic to cover in Building, so John decided to discuss it in a separate book. He invited me to join him in the project and suggested that I look at the directional tūns (Aston or Easton, Norton, Sutton, and Weston) to determine their distribution and function – if any – in the clusters. Meanwhile we have been on the lookout for other topographical-element-plus-tūn names which might be functional, the prime suspects being hōh-tūn and halh-tūn. By dividing the four sets of directional tūns into DB/parish and post-DB/non-parish groups it has proved possible to get some idea of their function and from what places they take their directional names.

Richard Coates (University of the West of England) ‘Naming Shirehampton and the name Shirehampton’

Using the example of the place-name Shirehampton, I explore (1) the complications involved in understanding the history of a particularly difficult place-name and in the history of the naming of the place in question, (2) some practical consequences of different understandings of the place-name at different points in history, and (3) the historical transfer of this name into other onomastic categories. Some new understandings of the name and its history are proposed. The paper can be taken as a demonstration of the lexical-semantic and phonological difficulties of historical onomastics (and therefore as academically routine), but also in the pleasures of travelling unexpected byways in the history of onomastics and in cultural history. I endeavour to affirm by example, in case it needed to be done, the case for historical onomastics as a discipline which ranges more widely than establishing the etymology of a name.

Fred Puss (Estonian Biographical Centre) ‘Estonian peasant surnames of English origin’

Estonia has historically been under the rule of Denmark, the German Order, Sweden, Poland, Russia, but never under Great Britain. The higher class has since the 17th century been mostly of German, in lesser numbers of Swedish and Russian descent. This is also the reason why in the 1820s and 1830s, when Estonian peasants, after having been recently released from serfdom, during the general name-giving process received very many German surnames in addition to Estonian ones. The peasants were often not asked about their own choice for a surname, but those were assigned by landlords or clergymen. There are a few places in Estonia where surnames of clearly English origin appear. For example, in one area the peasants received surnames like Bastard, Drink, Karpenter, Muddy, Potter etc, in another area Bristol, London, Lieverpohl etc. Several of those surnames are still being carried by Estonians (London by 80 people, Bristol by 41 etc). It is the subject of this paper to discuss how those names came to be, what could be the reason of giving those specific names to peasants and who were the persons who made up those names. Author applies prosopographical-territorial method to find answers to those questions.

Peter McClure (Institute for Name-Studies, University of Nottingham) ‘The English surname detective: recent encounters with phantoms, doppelgängers, shape changers, impostors and victims of mistaken identity’

The experience of editing the Oxford Dictionary of Family Names in Britain and Ireland has brought to light numerous examples of surnames whose deceptive appearances can lure surname historians and etymologists into mistaken conclusions about their origins. This paper illustrates the skills and methods that are needed to identify and unmask a myriad of surname disguises.

Eila Williamson (University of Glasgow) ‘Place-names on the Scottish border’

Abstract to follow

Mícheál Ó Mainnín and Frances Kane (Queen’s University Belfast) ‘Scottish influence on the place-names of Co. Antrim’

The Scottish influence on Irish place-names is most often considered in the context of the Plantation of Ulster from 1609; the settlement of large numbers of Lowland Scots in Ireland from that point is manifest in the presence of Scots elements (such as burn and brae) in the toponymy of Ulster and a further dimension of this influence can be seen in the employment of Scottish surnames in Ulster place-names (see McKay 2009). This paper seeks to establish if there is any other evidence for connectedness with Scotland in the place-names of east Ulster in view of the geographical proximity of County Antrim to the south-western highlands and the early connection between the two countries (going back to the fifth century at least) in terms of a shared Gaelic language. It will consider the elements most commonly found in County Antrim and seek to establish if any of these are distinctive within the Irish context and shared with neighbouring parts of Scotland. It will also look at other evidence for Scottish influence such as the presence of Albanach ‘Scot(tish)’ in place-names and the presence of what might possibly be Gaelic surnames of highland origin.

Chloé Colla (University of Glasgow) ‘Field-name evidence in a Lake District parish’

Abstract to follow

Liora Bigon (Holon Institute of Technology) ‘Enhancing place names studies acumen: historiographic reflections between (Urban) Africa and Israel/Palestine’

Embracing a synoptic perspective, we shall analyse research tendencies in place-name studies (toponymy) regarding sub-Saharan Africa, in light of their wider interference with other area-studies research traditions in toponymy, that is, of Europe and Israel/Palestine. While the last two decades are characterised in a “critical turn” in place-name scholarship and self-conscious engagement with critical theories of space and place, only meagre number of references touches sub-Saharan Africa (and Latin America and Asia). In addition, the recent research is over-concerned with the understanding that place naming reflects the power of modern political regimes, nationalism and ideology. The preoccupation with political power's control over both landscape and history is especially true for publications in English, which tend to be centred on the West and Eastern Europe, with only few geographic exceptions. The Euro-centrism is even enhanced considering the manifested uni-directionality of some of the research, such as that on street-renaming policies in European cities following revolutionary changes of political regimes, often disconnected from bottom-up responses on the part of the urban residents. It is also enhanced because of the classical methodological problem within the field of human geography, of the reliance on maps and gazetteers to study place names, on the expense of participant observation, interviews, and ethnographic methods. Similarly, in the case of the highly ideological and contested environment of Israel/Palestine, the Jewish-Arab conflict has engendered not only a divided and split space along status, ethnic and national lines ‒ but also split place-name historiographies with a remarkable contextual arrogance. By referring to some recent pioneering collective projects in place-name studies regarding the global South and by showing their potential enriching quality in terms of methodology and content, we strive to contribute for a de-Eurocentrisation of toponymic scholarship. This is through pointing on some inspiring and inclusive research directions, highlighting urban histories and colonial legacies.

Rob Briggs ‘A new lease of life (or three) for understanding the Old English -ing4 connective particle’

The fixation with chronology evident in a lot of Old English (OE) place-name studies, especially in the late 20th century, has too often been at the expense of due appreciation of the context in which early name-forms occur. Documentary sources have been mined for early attestations without adequate thought being given to their political, legal, or social backgrounds, and what these factors may contribute towards understanding the operative meanings of the name elements in question. So it is with the OE -ing4 connective particle, as classified by A. H. Smith more than 60 years ago. Identified as not being among the name-forming elements in earliest use in OE toponymy, it appears to have come into use after the advent of reliably-dated documentary sources in the final third of the 7th century CE. Despite the possibilities this affords for obtaining a detailed understanding of what it signified and why it was used, the particle tends to be translated in a very general manner (“associated with”). This paper will begin by surveying the documentary sources to establish when and where -ing4 first came into use in the OE toponomasticon. It will then move on consider the broader context, in particular legal and tenurial institutions, in order to offer new suggestions about the origins and most appropriate translation of the element. Slightly later textual testimony will also be noted that appears to represent either evidence to the contrary or a development in the significance of the -ing4 particle within a number of decades of its emergence in the extant documentary record. The research to be reported in this paper is incomplete, and the paper is intended to act as a catalyst for discussion and further research into the issues raised. Ultimately, it is hoped that it will demonstrate the potential for (re)considering certain OE place-name types and elements in relation to the different forms of tenure known to have operated during the Anglo-Saxon period.

William Patterson ‘The place-name Romanno in Peeblesshire’

The name which is now Romanno appears on record in the 12th century, in a grant de terra de Rumanac of land in feudo de Rothmaneic, to Holyrood Abbey (1165). Thereafter there is an alternation generally between Rumanach and Romanoch, till loss of final consonant as is typical of Gaelic place-names in middle to later Scots; Rothmaneic is thus an outlier, the only form containing the apparent first element in full. The name is generally explained on the lines of ‘monks’ earthwork or high status dwelling surrounded by an earthen rampart’ (Scots Gaelic ràth < Old Irish ráith < early Celtic rātis) + manach ‘monk’ in genitive plural). There are many ancient earthwork ‘forts’ and ‘settlements’ on the map, including a particularly impressive one at Whiteside Hill. This ‘monks’ rath’ has long seemed problematical, for reasons including that the francophone linguistic milieu of Holyrood Abbey and the aristocratic grantor would not have favoured such a Gaelic naming for a new property, the lack of any record, tradition, or archaeology supporting the possibility of an earlier monastic presence to justify the name, and conversely that other Gaelic place-names are a significant part of the linguistic mix in the locality. The search for a more satisfactory explanation looks at other manifestations of ràth (or close cognates) in Scotland, at other possibilities for the second element of the name, and at factors that make the location of Romanno rather special. It is in an area where ancient NE-SW and NW-SE routes intersect; where accordingly there was considerable activity and investment by the Roman military; and where important hoards of pre-Roman metalwork including items created far from Scotland have been found. Reflections on this feature of the area prompt a very speculative scenario linking those finds with the more famous hoards from Blair Drummond, Stirlingshire, and Broighter by Lough Foyle, Ireland; and offering a motive for the naming of the River Teith, for which a straightforward etymology has been in plain view but semantically difficult to justify.

Lesley Abrams (University of Oxford and University of Cambridge) The Cameron Lecture: ‘Vive la Différence? Place-names and Scandinavian settlement in England and Normandy in the Viking Age’

Scandinavians established themselves in a number of places outside their homelands during the Viking Age. This lecture will compare how place-names have been used in the construction of historical narratives about two of these locations, England and Normandy. Many factors – some institutional, some ideological – have helped to create contrasting attitudes to the impact of the Scandinavians. My lecture aims to explore these differences, focusing in particular on the role place-names have played in understanding the Scandinavian settlements in England and Normandy and on the forces affecting assessments of their historical value.

Keith Briggs ‘The surnames of thirteenth-century Ipswich’

By 1200 Ipswich was well established as one of the foremost English seaports. The town government produced numerous records which survive from about 1255 onwards, yet nearly all remain unpublished. They are a rich resource for the town’s history, and in this talk I will describe my work on the surnames in these records – town court rolls, recognizance rolls, charters, and deeds, which I have cross-referenced to national records such as the lay subsidy rolls which record many of the same people. The surnames reveal much about social structure, occupations, and place of origin of the local population. Amongst the names are several hard etymological puzzles which I offer to the conference for solution.

Jeremy Piercy (University of Lincoln) ‘Mint genealogies: moneying families in late Anglo-Saxon England’

The institutional cohesion of the minting structure in England during the tumultuous periods surrounding 1016 and 1066 is often used to bolster the idea of an Anglo-Saxon ‘state’. But, what if it was not so much the actions of the ‘state’ or royal administration, but the unity of the family and the persistence of hereditary practices that saved that institution and contributed to this idea of continuity? Through the examination of epigraphic records, this paper addresses familial insularity in the craft of minting. The moneyers operated within a skilled craft and passed on their operations to their progeny for generations until the mints themselves were formally consolidated in the thirteenth century. The naming practices of the moneyers maintained the Anglo-Saxon practices of using the forename element of the father in son’s and grandson’s names long after the practice had started to decline in much of England. The outcome of this was a group of skilled labourers that could respond to political and social upheaval with relative ease because the training and cohesion of their craft was maintained within the family. Therefore, the mints operated under traditional, centuries-long processes which circumstantially supported the historicized argument for an Anglo-Saxon ‘state’. This paper will look at the specific examples of this practice taking place at several different mints in order to illustrate a widespread pattern across the entirety of England for the eleventh century.

Mairéad Nic Lochlainn (Fiontar & Scoil na Gaeilge, DCU) ‘Project report on Logainm.ie and Meitheal Logainm.ie’

The project report will focus on the outputs of the current phase of Logainm.ie (the Placenames Database of Ireland) and Meitheal Logainm.ie (a crowdsourcing project for minor placenames in Ireland).

Pádraig Ó Cearbhaill (Placenames Branch) ‘Irish place-names associated with death’

My paper will outline some of the common generics associated with death in Irish toponymy, such as various words for burial mounds, graves and tombs, as well as some of the interesting specific elements for fratricide, death, soul and hell. I will consider the terminology from the point of view of distribution and meaning as well as highlighting significant aspects of a number of the names.

Thomas Clancy (University of Glasgow) ‘The names of the parishes of the Galloway Glens’

Abstract to follow

Jeremy Harte ‘You’ll never walk alone: haunted roads and goblin names’

‘‘The names of fierce, fabulous creatures are coupled with wild dismal places’’, wrote Kemble in 1852 and since then we have tended to agree, even if we prefer the tamer word ‘‘liminal’’. But the supernatural presences of medieval toponymy are not so easily shunted to the margins. Streets named after uncanny company can be found even – perhaps especially – in urban areas, making us think again about these goblin qualifiers. Up until now, we have practiced close reading in early place-names by focussing on durable facts and things, such as hills and land-ownership. What should we think of those names which refer to intangible and ontologically dubious entities? Do they represent one person’s strange experience, or the village’s common wisdom about the otherworld? Are we sure that they are literal statements – or are they just imaginative fictions? Puck Path and Hob Lane lead us to some unexpected places in semantic history.

Thursday, October 6, 2016

SNSBI Spring conference, 24-27 March 2017

http://www.snsbi.org.uk/pdf/SNSBI_Newsletter_13.pdf

Call for papers 

SNSBI Spring conference, 24-27 March 2017, 

Steventon, Oxfordshire 



So far the programme includes speakers on placenames and personal names from Oxfordshire and the surrounding counties. We will also want to make sure that we include contributions relating to other geographical areas and we would like to include a slot for people to give brief reports on projects.

We are keen to provide opportunities for students to speak, especially if they haven't given a talk before at an SNSBI conference. We're looking for talks of 20 to 30 minutes.

Please draw this to the attention of any students you know who might be interested. If you are interested in giving a paper or a project report, please contact Katie Hambrook, khambrook@brookes.ac.uk, by the end of October.